Dr.RheumBOS said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
Dr.RheumBOS said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Dr.RheumBOS said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Taking it to my next appointment.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.