One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
One thing that is still open after Dr.LeslieOBGYN’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardslucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
That reframing is the part I needed. Taking it to my next appointment.