lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Agreeing with lucas_SP_BR, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.ObesityLA said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.ObesityLA said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.