bri_stats said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Pushing back on bri_stats here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
bri_stats said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
bri_stats said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
claudia_zurich said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.