Jan 11, 2024 at 2:09 AM#11
LibrarianMeg said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Last edited: Jan 11, 2024 at 5:09 AM
48 21Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 11, 2024 at 4:10 AM#12
chris_chi24 said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
49 22CryptoCarl, MariaRD, AussieAnna and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 11, 2024 at 6:11 AM#13
LibrarianMeg said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Last edited: Jan 11, 2024 at 9:11 AM
50 23LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsJan 11, 2024 at 8:12 AM#14
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Last edited: Jan 11, 2024 at 11:12 AM
1 24sophie_paris
Reply Quote Save Share Report